Skip to main content

Production RAG applications

Retrieval quality looks excellent on demo questions and collapses when users ask messy, multi-hop, or stale-data questions. Hallucinations often start as retrieval misses, not model creativity.

Why common approaches fail

Teams optimize embedding similarity on clean corpora and skip chunking contracts, citation paths, ACL-aware retrieval, freshness, and evals that mirror production query distribution.

Activation insight

Retrieval quality can look excellent until users stop asking clean demo questions.

How Knackline solves it

We treat RAG as a production data path: chunking and index ownership, hybrid search, grounded citations, tenant isolation, and evaluation gates before raising autonomy.

System components

  • Chunking and index contracts

    Owners, versioning, and rollback for prompts and indexes.

  • Hybrid retrieval

    Sparse plus dense search with filters that respect ACLs.

  • Citation and groundedness

    Answers that point to sources operators can audit.

  • RAG evaluation sets

    Failure-derived cases, not only happy-path FAQ pairs.

Operational hardening

Drift detection on retrieval quality, multi-tenant ACL isolation that survives multi-hop retrieval, and change management when documents or models move.

Evidence from reports

FAQ

When is vector search not enough?
When relationships, ACL boundaries, or freshness matter more than nearest-neighbor similarity. GraphRAG and hybrid retrieval exist for those failure modes.
How do you evaluate RAG?
With sets drawn from real user failures: wrong version retrieved, missing citations, ACL leaks, and stale indexes, not only demo Q&A accuracy.